long time process - what's the progress?

Hi.
SQL 2005 Std. Linked server to iSeries. I have run INSERT INTO <sql
table> SELECT * FROM [I].[SERIES].[TA].[BLE]
There are about 23mln records to copy. I's been running for the last
half an hour and I would like to check what the progress is. Is there
any way of doing this?
PL
Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> How about below?
> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM <sql table> WITH(NOLOCK)
The result is zero. I guess that the whole import is being done through
some kind of temporary storage and enclosed in a transaction so it can
be tricky (impossible?) to see the progress.
Any other ideas?
PL
|||Piotr,
I suppose that if you know the size of your data and any other update load
being placed on the database, you could track the size of your transaction
log to see how much it is growing as the data is imported.
DBCC SQLPERF(LogSpace)
So, assume:
23,000,000 rows at 50 bytes average size.
Indexes add about 20% in size. (Depends on your index definitions)
Add another 20% overhead for the log entries.
1,656,000,000 bytes of log space
These are definitely just made up numbers, but do your own calculation
(taking into account all the factors that I do not know) and maybe you can
guess. (Truth in Advertising: I have never tried to use this approach for
figuring out the 'progress bar'.)
RLF
"Piotr Lipski" <pl@.mibi.pl> wrote in message
news:fimklr$bj5$1@.news.onet.pl...
> Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> The result is zero. I guess that the whole import is being done through
> some kind of temporary storage and enclosed in a transaction so it can be
> tricky (impossible?) to see the progress.
> Any other ideas?
> --
> PL

Long query block insert?

Hi,
Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my MS
SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3 hrs
to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process is
running no record can be inserted to this table.
Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
Thanks!
KH TanHi,
Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert data.
Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my
> MS
> SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3
> hrs
> to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process
> is
> running no record can be inserted to this table.
> Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
> Thanks!
> KH Tan|||Thanks!
I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex on
the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to normal..weird
!
Regards,
KH Tan.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:

> Hi,
> Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert dat
a.
> Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens
.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
> "KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Have you used sp_lock or select from sysprocesses to see where the blocking
might be?
--
Wei Xiao [MSFT]
SQL Server Storage Engine Development
http://blogs.msdn.com/weix
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"KH TAN" <KHTAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:78B09111-07E0-4380-A8A8-45FA56FD93CC@.microsoft.com...
> Thanks!
> I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
> running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex
on
> the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to
normal..weird![vbcol=seagreen]
> Regards,
> KH Tan.
>
> "Hari Prasad" wrote:
>
data.[vbcol=seagreen]
happens.[vbcol=seagreen]
my[vbcol=seagreen]
3[vbcol=seagreen]
process[vbcol=seagreen]

Long query block insert?

Hi,
Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my MS
SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3 hrs
to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process is
running no record can be inserted to this table.
Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
Thanks!
KH TanHi,
Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert data.
Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my
> MS
> SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3
> hrs
> to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process
> is
> running no record can be inserted to this table.
> Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
> Thanks!
> KH Tan|||Thanks!
I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex on
the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to normal..weird!
Regards,
KH Tan.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:
> Hi,
> Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert data.
> Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
> "KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> > Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my
> > MS
> > SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3
> > hrs
> > to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process
> > is
> > running no record can be inserted to this table.
> >
> > Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > KH Tan
>
>|||Have you used sp_lock or select from sysprocesses to see where the blocking
might be?
--
--
Wei Xiao [MSFT]
SQL Server Storage Engine Development
http://blogs.msdn.com/weix
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"KH TAN" <KHTAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:78B09111-07E0-4380-A8A8-45FA56FD93CC@.microsoft.com...
> Thanks!
> I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
> running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex
on
> the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to
normal..weird!
> Regards,
> KH Tan.
>
> "Hari Prasad" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert
data.
> > Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what
happens.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hari
> > SQL Server MVP
> >
> > "KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
> > > Hi,
> > > Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of
my
> > > MS
> > > SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than
3
> > > hrs
> > > to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp
process
> > > is
> > > running no record can be inserted to this table.
> > >
> > > Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > KH Tan
> >
> >
> >

Long query block insert?

Hi,
Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my MS
SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3 hrs
to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process is
running no record can be inserted to this table.
Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
Thanks!
KH Tan
Hi,
Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert data.
Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Have a question, I have a select query that I used for bcp out one of my
> MS
> SQL 2000 DB table ( about 30 million of records) and it take more than 3
> hrs
> to finish(about 13 million record). It happen that when this bcp process
> is
> running no record can be inserted to this table.
> Isn't that the select will release lock after it read pass the data?
> Thanks!
> KH Tan
|||Thanks!
I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex on
the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to normal..weird!
Regards,
KH Tan.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:

> Hi,
> Generally for BCP OUT the table will not be locked and user can insert data.
> Can you try using BCP OUT with -b (Batch size) option and see what happens.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
> "KH TAN" <KH TAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A4F01220-E1A3-4329-B059-6807D824A7B4@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Have you used sp_lock or select from sysprocesses to see where the blocking
might be?
--
Wei Xiao [MSFT]
SQL Server Storage Engine Development
http://blogs.msdn.com/weix
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"KH TAN" <KHTAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:78B09111-07E0-4380-A8A8-45FA56FD93CC@.microsoft.com...
> Thanks!
> I notice that not only the BCP Out having the problem, some other long
> running query (select statement) also do the same. I do a dbcc dbreindex
on
> the table and rerun the query, everything seem comming back to
normal..weird![vbcol=seagreen]
> Regards,
> KH Tan.
>
> "Hari Prasad" wrote:
data.[vbcol=seagreen]
happens.[vbcol=seagreen]
my[vbcol=seagreen]
3[vbcol=seagreen]
process[vbcol=seagreen]
sql

long processing time

Hi all,
I have a datawarehouse which contain a historical table holding close to 100
million records... this table is growing exponentially. Everytime I process
my cube, data has to be read from this table and it is taking very long
before data is returned (between 2-3 hours)
Is there anyway for me to speed this up?
Troubled,
NestorIf you have the Enterprise edition of SQL Server you should look into
partitioning. With partitions you can process things in parallel and you
can also possibly only re-process recent data.
Depending on your situation you may also be able to look into
incremental processing, but this only works if your dimensions do not
change (you can add new members, but moving existing members under new
parents will break incremental processing)
You should also make sure your schema is optimized so that you are
minimizing the joins that have to be done against the relational data
source.
Regards
Darren Gosbell [MCSD]
Blog: http://www.geekswithblogs.net/darrengosbell
In article <edXVSA44FHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, n3570r@.yahoo.com
says...
> Hi all,
> I have a datawarehouse which contain a historical table holding close to 1
00
> million records... this table is growing exponentially. Everytime I proces
s
> my cube, data has to be read from this table and it is taking very long
> before data is returned (between 2-3 hours)
> Is there anyway for me to speed this up?
> Troubled,
> Nestor
>
>

long processing time

Hi all,
I have a datawarehouse which contain a historical table holding close to 100
million records... this table is growing exponentially. Everytime I process
my cube, data has to be read from this table and it is taking very long
before data is returned (between 2-3 hours)
Is there anyway for me to speed this up?
Troubled,
Nestor
If you have the Enterprise edition of SQL Server you should look into
partitioning. With partitions you can process things in parallel and you
can also possibly only re-process recent data.
Depending on your situation you may also be able to look into
incremental processing, but this only works if your dimensions do not
change (you can add new members, but moving existing members under new
parents will break incremental processing)
You should also make sure your schema is optimized so that you are
minimizing the joins that have to be done against the relational data
source.
Regards
Darren Gosbell [MCSD]
Blog: http://www.geekswithblogs.net/darrengosbell
In article <edXVSA44FHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, n3570r@.yahoo.com
says...
> Hi all,
> I have a datawarehouse which contain a historical table holding close to 100
> million records... this table is growing exponentially. Everytime I process
> my cube, data has to be read from this table and it is taking very long
> before data is returned (between 2-3 hours)
> Is there anyway for me to speed this up?
> Troubled,
> Nestor
>
>
sql

long insert time

I have a table with about half a million records.
Select queries run fine.
This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
What are some possible causes?Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:OpY%23$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
>
I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
Any idea for the change in performance?|||Blocking is still a possible reason.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> > Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
> >
> I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
> times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
> time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
> Any idea for the change in performance?
>|||Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote in message
news:u5gzVvYQEHA.3596@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Blocking is still a possible reason.
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
>
> "Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> >
> > > Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
> > >
> >
> > I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
> > times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
> > time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
> >
> > Any idea for the change in performance?
> >
>|||Hi,
As Tiber pointed out this execution time diffence while inserting a record
will be due to Blocking. So to see the blocking:-
While you execute the insert statement, if it is delaying open a new query
analyzer window and execute SP_WHO command.
In the result look for the column BLK, In the normal case all the values
will be "0". If there is a block then a SPID will displayed in BLK field.
If blocked understand the statement that user( SPID - blocked ) is doing by
using the below command:-
DBCC INPUTBUFFER(SPID) -- Replace the SPID with the SPID blocked.
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OpY#$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:
> Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
>
OK. Looking up Blocking in Books Online.
Next time I have this issue, I will be write down the DB size to see if
the autogrow is part of the problem. Thanks.sql

long insert time

I have a table with about half a million records.
Select queries run fine.
This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
What are some possible causes?Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:OpY%23$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
..
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:

> Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
>
I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
Any idea for the change in performance?|||Blocking is still a possible reason.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
..
> Tibor Karaszi wrote:
>
> I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
> times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
> time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
> Any idea for the change in performance?
>|||Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote in
message
news:u5gzVvYQEHA.3596@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Blocking is still a possible reason.
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
>
> "Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK
2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>|||Hi,
As Tiber pointed out this execution time diffence while inserting a record
will be due to Blocking. So to see the blocking:-
While you execute the insert statement, if it is delaying open a new query
analyzer window and execute SP_WHO command.
In the result look for the column BLK, In the normal case all the values
will be "0". If there is a block then a SPID will displayed in BLK field.
If blocked understand the statement that user( SPID - blocked ) is doing by
using the below command:-
DBCC INPUTBUFFER(SPID) -- Replace the SPID with the SPID blocked.
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OpY#$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:

> Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
>
OK. Looking up Blocking in Books Online.
Next time I have this issue, I will be write down the DB size to see if
the autogrow is part of the problem. Thanks.

long insert time

I have a table with about half a million records.
Select queries run fine.
This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
What are some possible causes?
Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:OpY%23$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>
|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:

> Two possible causes are blocking and insert trigger(s) on the table.
>
I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
Any idea for the change in performance?
|||Blocking is still a possible reason.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Tibor Karaszi wrote:
>
> I don't have any triggers. Funny thing, I re-ran the query about 5
> times. The first 4 times it took over a minute to perform. The 5th
> time, it took 2 seconds. I performed it again and it only took 2 seconds.
> Any idea for the change in performance?
>
|||Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote in message
news:u5gzVvYQEHA.3596@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Blocking is still a possible reason.
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
>
> "Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%237B4JrYQEHA.1348@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
|||Hi,
As Tiber pointed out this execution time diffence while inserting a record
will be due to Blocking. So to see the blocking:-
While you execute the insert statement, if it is delaying open a new query
analyzer window and execute SP_WHO command.
In the result look for the column BLK, In the normal case all the values
will be "0". If there is a block then a SPID will displayed in BLK field.
If blocked understand the statement that user( SPID - blocked ) is doing by
using the below command:-
DBCC INPUTBUFFER(SPID) -- Replace the SPID with the SPID blocked.
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Won Lee" <noemail@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OpY#$dYQEHA.2876@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with about half a million records.
> Select queries run fine.
> This test query I ran in QA took over 1 minute to run.
> insert into tradeData values (0, '5/23/04', '20:00:00', 0, 0.00)
> What are some possible causes?
>
|||Tibor Karaszi wrote:

> Another reason could be an autogrow kicking in...
>
OK. Looking up Blocking in Books Online.
Next time I have this issue, I will be write down the DB size to see if
the autogrow is part of the problem. Thanks.

login with security on records based on data (not tables)

Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Pieter
See if this helps:
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/row_level_s..._databases.htm
HTH,
Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
"DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Pieter
|||Thanks man! You did a nice job there!! This wil be very helpfull!!!
"Narayana Vyas Kondreddi" <answer_me@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:esiJ5RoiEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> See if this helps:
> http://vyaskn.tripod.com/row_level_s..._databases.htm
> --
> HTH,
> Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
> http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
>
> "DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
> certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
> For example login LoginA can should only be able to
> update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB
only
> those for Company = 'B'.
> Is there some way for doing this?
> I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
> login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would
really
> need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one
view
> for all the login's).
> Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
> behaviour?
> Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> Pieter
>
>

login with security on records based on data (not tables)

Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
PieterSee if this helps:
es.htm" target="_blank">http://vyaskn.tripod.com/ row_level...as
es.htm
--
HTH,
Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
"DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Pieter|||Thanks man! You did a nice job there!! This wil be very helpfull!!!
"Narayana Vyas Kondreddi" <answer_me@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:esiJ5RoiEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> See if this helps:
> es.htm" target="_blank">http://vyaskn.tripod.com/ row_level...as
es.htm
> --
> HTH,
> Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
> http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
>
> "DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
> certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
> For example login LoginA can should only be able to
> update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB
only
> those for Company = 'B'.
> Is there some way for doing this?
> I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
> login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would
really
> need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one
view
> for all the login's).
> Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
> behaviour?
> Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> Pieter
>
>

login with security on records based on data (not tables)

Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
PieterSee if this helps:
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/row_level_security_in_sql_server_databases.htm
--
HTH,
Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
"DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Hi,
Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
For example login LoginA can should only be able to
update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB only
those for Company = 'B'.
Is there some way for doing this?
I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would really
need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one view
for all the login's).
Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
behaviour?
Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Pieter|||Thanks man! You did a nice job there!! This wil be very helpfull!!!
"Narayana Vyas Kondreddi" <answer_me@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:esiJ5RoiEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> See if this helps:
> http://vyaskn.tripod.com/row_level_security_in_sql_server_databases.htm
> --
> HTH,
> Vyas, MVP (SQL Server)
> http://vyaskn.tripod.com/
>
> "DraguVaso" <pietercoucke@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ugcklHoiEHA.2356@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Is it possible to define a login on an SQL SERVER that has only access to
> certain records in a table based on the data in the records?
> For example login LoginA can should only be able to
> update/read/insert/delete records with the Field Company = 'A'. LoginB
only
> those for Company = 'B'.
> Is there some way for doing this?
> I should be able to do something like this with views (one view for each
> login), and define in the views the records they can use. But I would
really
> need something directly to the table, or if not with only one view (one
view
> for all the login's).
> Is there some way, soem trick or I don't knwo what the produce such a
> behaviour?
> Any help or hint would be really aprpeciated!
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> Pieter
>
>