Showing posts with label freefish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freefish. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Long Running SQL Job

is there any contention while this sp is running as a job?
--
Venkat
sql server admirer
"FreeFish" wrote:

> I've got a SQL SP that when executed in QA takes 5 minutes to run, but whe
n
> scheduled as a Job, takes 35 minutes. Can anyone offer an explanation as
to
> why the difference?Nothing in particular. It would be the same as when I run in QA.
"Venkat" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> is there any contention while this sp is running as a job?
> --
> Venkat
> sql server admirer
>
> "FreeFish" wrote:
>|||I found it: SET NOCOUNT ON
Found this in a previous post on the same topic.
Thanks -
"FreeFish" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Nothing in particular. It would be the same as when I run in QA.
> "Venkat" wrote:
>|||I've got a SQL SP that when executed in QA takes 5 minutes to run, but when
scheduled as a Job, takes 35 minutes. Can anyone offer an explanation as to
why the difference?|||is there any contention while this sp is running as a job?
--
Venkat
sql server admirer
"FreeFish" wrote:

> I've got a SQL SP that when executed in QA takes 5 minutes to run, but whe
n
> scheduled as a Job, takes 35 minutes. Can anyone offer an explanation as
to
> why the difference?|||Nothing in particular. It would be the same as when I run in QA.
"Venkat" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> is there any contention while this sp is running as a job?
> --
> Venkat
> sql server admirer
>
> "FreeFish" wrote:
>|||I found it: SET NOCOUNT ON
Found this in a previous post on the same topic.
Thanks -
"FreeFish" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Nothing in particular. It would be the same as when I run in QA.
> "Venkat" wrote:
>